For Her, Seeing is Believing: Patriarchal Feminist Theory (White People Problems)

Catherine Brennan has found comfort supporting a common, traditional, patriarchal binary for sex and further desires to seek her destiny in the limitations of a well-defined, pseudo-scientific and unnatural, that is, ideological and static female sex that belongs to her by birth, giving owning it a grotesque new sense.

She is female because she’s inherited the property, the organs she found in her body. It’s a terribly proscribed anti-intellectual take on sex and gender, no?

Panicked Brennan is in fear of becoming undone. I think she must feel an urge towards feminism for fear of otherwise losing her genitalia.

Brennan on being female: 

I accept trans women as women. I don’t accept trans women as female - because they are not female. If they were female, we wouldn’t be having this stupid conversation all the time.

I support gender identity protections that don’t fuck over females.  See http://radicalhub.com/2011/08/15/frequently-asked-questions-about-brennan-hungerfords-un-submission-re-gender-identity-legislation/

I believe that Females have an absolute right to set a boundary based on sex - because they say so. And you should respect that.

PS - Expressing opinions on the internet is not “harassing” anyone, you nitwit.

  1. quickjam reblogged this from dagseoul
  2. sexgenderbody reblogged this from an-injury-to-all
  3. an-injury-to-all reblogged this from ghost-of-algren and added:
    Oh (trans-)misogynistic feminists… I can’t wait until after a few decades when the movement looks back at this and says,...
  4. ghost-of-algren reblogged this from dagseoul
  5. interruptions said: Check out the def they provide of “gender identity” at note xxix in the communication the FAQ is about. Apparently only trans people have one.
  6. dagseoul posted this