SARAH SHAW "Riding the white horse: On being foreign in South Korea"

Sarah Shaw is not the first white teacher to address Koreans and their mean stereotypes, but white people do love two things: playing cultural anthropologists and being foreign, and her memoir is exemplary at both. What’s better than dressing up as your favorite women of color than actually pretending to be a minority in a safe place and getting paid for it?
Shaw’s memoir begins, in typical fashion, with the recognition that Korean men, no matter how nice they attempt to be, are just awful. Sorry, Korean guys, but this white feminist has got your number.
KEVIN, my Korean co-teacher, had an idea for our open class. “Let’s make a motivational video,” he suggested. “I’ll ask, ‘Would you like some more?’ you’ll say, ‘Yes, please,’ and after we repeat this a couple times, you’ll stuff your shirt with balloons. When you stand up to clear your tray, you’ll look really fat!”
“Really, Kevin? I have to be the fat foreigner?”
“It would be so funny,” he assured me, “and it would make the students more interested in the lesson.”
I sighed. I wasn’t too keen on the idea of humiliating myself in front of all my students and the classroom evaluators by acting as the stereotypical fat Westerner, but I wasn’t opposed to the idea either. It certainly wasn’t politically correct, and I would never think to create a “humorous” video like this in the United States. But I wasn’t in the United States; I was in Korea, and after several months living as an expat and teaching English in Seoul, I knew that the image of “fat people” made Koreans of all ages burst into uncontrollable fits of laughter.

Fucking Koreans, right?! I mean, Shaw knew how much they love to laugh at fat people, but there she was actually observing Koreans laughing at fat people. How did this happen? Not privilege, certainly. Except, she was going to have to be that fat person and that wasn’t comfortable. Instead of telling her co-teacher, “Kevin, I’m not dressing up in balloons to be a person everyone will laugh at because I think it’s demeaning and weird,” Sarah put on the fat-suit made of balloons anyway. After all, these teachers, these students, these people, her neighbors, all Koreans, are just part of her experiment in playing with others’ cultures.

This story is the introduction to Shaw’s essay about being foreign in Korea Apparently, two things must be included in every white narrative about life in Korea: in spite of great jobs, safe social lives, impressive health care, and a large community of foreigners in a country where an English speaker with absolutely no knowledge of the native language can get around with relatively few difficulties, authors must illustrate how humiliating it is to be a white minority and how ignorant Koreans can be.

Notice how, even though Shaw participated in the stupid project rather than creating a better one of her own, she conveniently gives herself a Get-Out-of-a-Moral-Dilemma-Free pass because “I wasn’t in the US, I was in Korea” and she just wanted to make the kids laugh, even if it was at fat people. Sounds like a wonderful teaching moment, right? Not for this teacher. Hell no. She was just a powerless foreign woman who Kevin Teacher was masterfully dominating, though he clearly had no clue about it.

We should keep track of the tourist teacher clichés in this post. We have three here. One, Koreans are mindless bigots. Two, Korean sense of humor is just crude slapstick like laughing at fat people and farts and no one in the world has ever seen other people laugh at this shit. Three, Korean men are naive sexists. With only the introduction to her foreigner memoir out of the way, Sarah Shaw is really taking it to Korean culture.

Republic of Korea 0 : 3 Sarah Shaw

After studying in Seoul as an exchange student in 2009, I returned to teach English at a public school in 2011. I was placed at a low-income elementary school located in northeast Seoul, where half of the students’ families were receiving welfare checks from the government, and I was paired with Kevin, a 40-year-old devout Christian, married with two children. Kevin was raised in the mountainous countryside and spent his youth studying diligently in order to gain acceptance at a prestigious university in Seoul. Because of his humble background, good sense of humor, and years of experience working with children, Kevin could easily connect with our 12-year-old students. We’d teach together Monday through Friday for 22 hours a week, and we’d often role play. In one instance I asked, “What are you doing?” and Kevin immediately squatted down, contorted his face, and responded, “I’m pooping!” indulging in a classic form of Korean slapstick humor. The boys burst into fits of giggles, while most of the girls wrinkled their noses in disgust. I laughed, and thought, This man is having more fun than the kids.

This is going nowhere good is it. Shaw is scoring high cliché points, though, and completely shutting the actual Korea and its culture out. In one paragraph, she professionally emasculates Kevin. Sure, Shaw admits that he makes her feel comfortable, but it’s clear he’d be offended and embarrassed by her ridiculous representation of him as obeisant to Christianity and Acceptance. In one sentence, she wonders at his years of dedication as a student to achieve such humble placement as a teacher in a working class school (another cliché) and, in the next, she infantilizes him by performing being gobsmacked that he could “easily connect with our 12-year-old students.” I could go on, but you get the point, I hope.

Korean men never fare well when white feminists write about them unless they’ve married one or are happily dating one. Then Korean men are great. Typically, though, Korean men are often not only patronized in these discussions but talked about as if they were little boys. Shaw’s essay is not only a harsh generalization, so far relying on stereotypical descriptions, but it has not one citation to back up claims like “I was placed at a low-income elementary school in northeast Seoul, where half of the students’ families were receiving welfare checks from the government… .” White people are really only ever doing good if they’re hanging around with poorer people of color. Moreover, if you had never lived in Seoul, you might think Shaw was stuck out in the dangerous ghettoes in the hinterlands of Seoul, out “northeast”. However, the truth is that she was teaching in an area where thousands of foreign teachers live.

What Shaw needs is an editor with a fucking stick standing behind her to punish her for each generalization, hyperbole, and bullshit claim she makes. Is this a memoir meant to explain what life is like in Seoul as a foreign teacher or is it an attempt to settle a score? I think the latter because Shaw has scored often in only several paragraphs.

Republic of Korea 0 : 6 Sarah Shaw

 From the first day in the classroom, Kevin made me feel comfortable. We would have contests where the students would write the days of the week in English and I would have to write them in Korean. He would give extra attention to the low-level students to encourage them to enjoy studying English, and I would laugh when he would enthusiastically respond to things that I found quite normal, such as glimpsing a screen full of women in bikinis when he googled the word “hot” for our lesson about temperature.

Because of our extroverted natures, Kevin and I were able to chat freely, but as an older man in an ageist society, he could also be quite stubborn and controlling. On Thanksgiving, we argued for 15 minutes in front of the class after he thought my explanation of American Thanksgiving was wrong. Another time, in Korean, he jokingly told the class I had failed my required drug test. “Kevin, that didn’t happen!” I retorted, “They’ll tell their parents!” He was shocked that I’d understood.

You’d think with that first sentence, Shaw was going to give Kevin a little credit. Right? Nope. She’s merely setting Kevin up again. Though he really loves his students, he’s just a little boy who gets shy seeing women in bikinis. Though extroverted—whatever that means because Shaw never explains a fucking thing—Kevin took advantage of her open nature and told the kids she was a drug addict. Here we have clichés #7 and #8: all Koreans think foreigners are drug addicts and Koreans don’t think foreigners can understand them. We have no reason not to believe Kevin Teacher said this to some of the students, though it’s strange for an elementary teacher to talk this way to the kids. What’s missing is any sort of attempt to place the accusation in context. All we get is a description of the claim itself. Shaw simply cannot or is willfully refusing to describe anything with detail. And somebody needs to teach her that this makes an author appear to be disingenuous at best, a liar at worst.

Republic of Korea 0 : 8 Sarah Shaw 

As I hope I’m making clear, Shaw is not interested in offering a complex narrative for her memoir. She’s posing as a thoughtful writer to tell on Kevin who would be horrified if he knew she wrote this. After all, her photo is on the site, her full name on the memoir, she’s already commenting on it from her Facebook account. And so, everyone will know who Kevin Teacher is whether or not “Kevin” is his actual name. Shaw notes:

When we embarked on a staff hiking trip, [Kevin] had me pose next to a sign that said “Danger! High Voltage! Do not climb!” It was all in good humor and he wasn’t intending to offend me, but I felt embarrassed to be used as the punchline of his “stupid foreigner” jokes.

The paragraph above offers a skeleton for a Shaw Score Settled Against Koreans. She provides no context whatsoever; the transition into this short paragraph follows her description of times in the classroom; the memoir is putatively about being a foreign teacher in Korea, but Shaw is merely dishing dirt on Kevin Teacher. Here, Kevin makes jokes about a stupid foreigner. And Shaw scores another point, sticking in quotation marks around “stupid foreigner” insinuating Kevin thought she was one—and this comes at an interesting transition in Shaw’s memoir where she will begin to address sex. Shaw implies nobody knows sex and sexual oppression as she does, and this Korean Christian Sexist, Kevin, will not escape criticism. He’s just a naive puritan who fucked with the wrong tourist.

One day, I was reading the book Honolulu, by Alan Brennert, a fictional account of a Korean picture bride’s life in Hawaii in the early 1900s. Kevin noticed the image of the Korean woman on the front cover, wearing an off-the-shoulder top and bowing her head in sorrow. “Why is she wearing such an obscene shirt?” he asked.

I was surprised; I thought the woman looked both beautiful and classy. “I don’t think it’s obscene. Lots of women wear shirts like that in Western countries.”

Shaw knows classy when she sees it and Kevin is too uptight. It’s at this point, when I first read this after Praise showed it to me, that I decided Shaw is pretty much making shit up. She’s not entirely fabricating situations, but she is clearly creating dialogue. To be honest, Kevin might not even exist. If we are to believe Shaw, Kevin is a big tween in teacher’s britches who is devoted to God, leers at her because she is extroverted, and doesn’t understand how classy oppressed-looking, Korean women are on book covers. It’s all rather ludicrous, but she scores points. I’m not going to post more about this section, but it ends with Kevin saying “Divorce? Oh, no.”

Republic of Korea 0 : Sarah Shaw 11

I want to address something that has me annoyed above all else. Shaw would have us believe that not only does she know about and understand Korean language, history, and culture, but that she’s a feminist extrovert who’s comfortable and cool in what can be trying circumstances. Shaw is the all-seeing, all-knowing white expert who, I’m sure she sees nothing wrong with this, is merely contrasting Korean (Kevin is a stand-in for Koreans) conservative views and perceptions of Western women with her objective representation of the reality. SHE is that representation. It’s Sarah v. Kevin. Thus, she is not even remotely objective. But not just that: Shaw is confessing her own conservative views and her perceptions of Korea and Koreans, but without submitting them to any scrutiny at all. It’s the worst kind of writing. If she were my student, I’d refuse to grade her work. Revise and resubmit. What she has done should be unacceptable and for a professional organization to provide her with a soapbox to dish dirt, make accusations, and be what those of us who’ve lived here for a while all consider racist.

At this point, we’re not even halfway through Shaw’s memoir and she has not actually talked about herself at all. I’m going to skip to where she does. Guess who fares well in Shaw’s memoir about being a foreigner? Of course she does.

Like Jess, when I first arrived in Korea in 2009, I spent my exchange semester unaware of the stereotypes that applied to Western females. I too would wear North American-style, sleeveless, low-cut tank tops. Even though I didn’t show the same amount of cleavage as Jess, I didn’t give any thought to the slut factor.

In fact, I wasn’t paying attention to how Korean society perceived me at all, since I had started dating an exchange student from the Netherlands. Although his ethnicity is Korean, he was adopted at birth, so we both were experiencing Korean culture and language for the first time. We were in love, and we certainly weren’t stressing over cultural taboos.

We both lived in the dormitory at our university, which was separated by gender, a stark contrast to my college dorm back in the States, where boys and girls were allowed to room together on specified floors, and a bottomless basket of government-funded NYC condoms were available in the lobby.

Shaw is so enlightened. Once again, Korea is ridiculously stereotyped as an oppressive puritanical society where the US is a fucking paradise. Literally, a fucking paradise, as coed uni dorms offer bottomless baskets of condoms to the students.

Republic of Korea 0 : Sarah Shaw 12

I have to be honest. I have no desire to slut-shame Sarah Shaw. I don’t even want the perception. So, I’m not going to address how she writes about her very short time in Korean university as an exchange student. It’s clear Shaw is proud of her “overt sexuality” whatever that means. As I’ve noted, her memoir is not very detailed. To avoid confusion, I’m simply going to let you check it out for yourselves.

Unfortunately, Shaw doesn’t take too long before bringing Kevin back into the narrative. She has to because he’s a character her narrative depends on. I can’t skip this part. What Shaw does is, in my opinion, unforgiveable. She consistently illustrates herself as open and curious in her discussions with Kevin. I wonder why, then, she consistently punishes him, in this narrative, for being frank and curious with her?

Kevin continued bringing up topics related to sex during our lunch break, and I always chose to respond, curious as to what he would say and, in a way, encouraging him to confront his own stereotypes. He’d talk about how he wanted to watch porn, but couldn’t because he lived with his mother-in-law, or he’d mention how he once stared at two girls in Australia for two minutes who were wearing bikinis and lying on their stomachs, hoping they would turn over.

He mentioned how he used to work at an English education center with several native English teachers, and he would frequently talk about an African-American male colleague who would indulge him in detailed accounts of his sexual escapades with Korean women. When his colleague embarked on “the midnight run,” a term for English teachers who suddenly leave Korea without notifying their employers, they found a library of porn on his office computer.

Shaw continues to dish on Kevin and other men with a story about rainbow parties. I’m not interested in discussing it. What’s the point?

Republic of Korea 0 : Sarah Shaw 13

And again, Shaw quickly scores points making herself Kevin’s teacher:

Although Kevin’s stereotypical comments often frustrated me, with the absence of Western male teachers at our school, I realized that I was probably one of the only people he could talk to about sex. Without realizing it himself, he was living in a sexually oppressive society, mainly because of his status in the church. He once mentioned that he wanted to accompany his colleague to the red-light district in Sydney during a month-long educational fieldwork excursion, but he knew he wouldn’t be able to control himself and remain faithful to his wife. “Religion is essential to preventing us from those things that we desire,” he said. While Kevin proved to be a loyal husband, I began feeling sorry for him. If he had a healthy sexual connection with his wife, he probably would have been discussing these issues with her rather than me.

I think this might be the most offensive paragraph in the narrative. I don’t know. Maybe you’ll find another one. Shaw is not only enlightened, healthily extroverted, educated about the world, but she’s also a sex counselor for Kevin who’s now fully transformed into a one-dimensional masturbating prude who hides in Church from sex and lusts after his foreign co-teacher and sneaks peeks at porn from time to time. In addition, because of Korea, he lacks the ability to properly discuss any of this. This is like a hat-trick of points and high clichés.

Republic of Korea 0 : Sarah Shaw 16

I hope I’m being rather transparent about how full of clichés and empty of meaningful focus and detail Shaw’s memoir about being a foreigner is because I’m finding it hard to re-read this crap and so am going to skip to the end. If you feel like reading it, Shaw continues to discuss sex and sexuality and nosy neighbors and love motels—because Koreans, though prudes, also like to sneak away to have sex. So, that’s good, according to Shaw, but also not good because, unlike Westerners, Koreans are not overt about it, whatever that means.

Republic of Korea 0 : Sarah Shaw 17

I think Shaw is an outright bigot. A high-minded fool. I think she’s a colonialist pig and a patronizing shit. She believes being empowered is being a flirty know-it-all who pretends to be frank without ever being genuine and claims this is empowerment. Did Kevin know he was merely an object of curious observation? I know, now I’m stereotyping. Here’s the deal, I have a lot of writing from Shaw that illustrates my generalization about her. I don’t have the stomach to continue analyzing the final 40% of her work. On the other hand, having read the entire memoir twice, I still know nothing about Kevin. Shaw’s writing about Korea is typical, not because it’s honest, which it is not, but because it serves to merely justify the author’s preconceived notions about Korea, Koreans, their lives and language.

Am I wrong? I’m here.

White Boy of the Week: Tumblr Usr YOUTH

When this white guy isn’t studying the world’s religions and practicing tolerance and masturbation, he’s looking up “vagina” on the Internet and calming chicks tits about his twisted posts. Why should that make him a bad guy? Why?

lavoyage:

What the fuck crawled up your ass? Look I’m a religion major, I get your frustration and I’m all about religious tolerance and sensitivity to native languages and meaning, but if you’re going to get upset over one stranger getting a line off wikipedia and posting in on tumblr, you’re going to have a ton of issues. I wasn’t even making a joke, so calm your tits and have many seats. Its not that serious. Go up to someone who actually is making a joke out of your religion and get on their case, because you’ve definitely gotten my post twisted into something it isn’t. 
36 notes

the different skins theory of not evolving

Another Tale from the ongoing saga, WHITES IN KOREA

Praise told me this one yesterday.

Talking with a friend who’s leaving Korea soon, likely for good, after living here off and on for several years, Praise asked if she was ready to leave; if she’d miss it. Friend answered that she doesn’t think she needs to be living in a country where they eat dog. She said this to Praise, her Korean American friend, proving once again that our white friends use her to confess all sorts of their shitty nonsense about how they think about Koreans, specifically, and people in color, in general.

Apparently, it wasn’t a bad joke.

This person has been to and from Korea, working at schools, eating, sleeping, being cared for, receiving the benefits of Korean labor, but her parting commentary on her time here is you eat dog. I know it’s cliché to say this, but what the fuck goes on in people’s minds?

What brought that statement out? It’s a bitter retort, for sure, and not an honest appraisal of her time spent here, which is what Praise was asking. After all, who wants to go back to the US right now? It’s terribly rash, if not utterly naïve. What kind of ethical approach could be represented by such a response if it is to be taken seriously, what sort of critical and thoughtful reflection? Perhaps: “I’d rather live with the colonizers of Korea who brought massive death to the peninsula and signed-off on Japan’s occupation in a simple, secret meeting—I’d rather live with them than Koreans because they eat dogs.” I’m trying to illustrate the crazy notion about the world to conclude Korea is not a good place because “they eat dogs”.

What could she possibly have meant? And why to Praise? Her Korean-American friend who was trying to discuss the pain of leaving friends and comfortable place. This is, after all, a woman who has already left and returned. Why did she come back? 

I know, it’s a stupid thing to say. She tried to belittle an emotional moment into a small-talk thing—“Oh, you know, they eat dogs, so what do I care?” It’s meant to be flippant. If so, then why so terribly rude?

I hate to say it, but did her Eat Pray Love moment never happen?

Anyway, gobsmacked at the story. I expected more from our friend.

6 notes

something about Luke, submissive wives, serpents tongues, fema coffins, concentration camps, RHINOs, and some right wing extremists.

2 notes

Possible Topics for White History Month:

  • Yoga
  • How Fashion is Never Appropriation
  • Tantric Sex
  • Introduction to Foreign Languages for Tattoos 
  • Guns
  • Reactionaryism for Beginners
  • The Spices of the Orient
  • Buddhism
  • Eat Pray Love
  • The Benefits of Historical Revisionism
  • How to Save Africa
  • A Primer for Progressive Rock
  • Indoor Jackets
  • Whatever Happened to The Quad Cities?
  • A Bolder Boulder
  • The Other Oklahoma

266 notes

I went into the local chicken place to order fried chicken to take home and sitting in the middle of the room were four white guys and three Korean women. The guys were talking to themselves in English; the women to themselves in Korean. The women were talking about how they met the guys and other stuff. The men were talking rather loudly, as they had six bottles of soju on the table and were red-face drunk, about how “South Koreans” think about “North Koreans” and their favorite dictators. I shit you not. It took five minutes before I interrupted them and asked them to shut the fuck up. They were pissed, of course, but it was an embarrassing conversation. This chicken place is frequented by older locals and so the white guys were in the middle of the room yapping about shit they didn’t understand—quite frankly, they were making it up as they went along—and were surrounded by the generation of Koreans they were loudly addressing without addressing.

And this is how obscene whiteness gets in Korea (and on tumblr about Korea): loudly addressing Korea, Korean culture, Koreans, Korean history, in English or in half-baked Hangukmal, without addressing Koreans, Korean culture, Korea, Korean history—loudly addressing without addressing and being put-out when confronted about it.

To be honest, I was hoping one of the assholes would want a fight. But they all just shut up. Ten minutes later, I left with my chicken.

11 notes

I like my chai like I like my men.

lameduckie:

tall, hot, strong, dark, spicy, and dirty.

Obnoxiously white forever.

(Source: ofgingersandjacobins)

13 notes

dagNotes: On Freedom; Or, Why I don’t trust most white people.

dagseoul:

They believe they have a freedom that, factually and historically, no person of color has, the freedom (to pretend) to be ignorant of difference. The performance of this ignorance to others—white and not-white—is one of the most pervasive and irritating aspects of everyday whiteness. This freedom is a distinctly white privilege. I’d say, this freedom is the most recognizable marker for whiteness as it’s the most ordinary in appearance. People who can be free from knowing about others who are not white are fully composed white individuals. The others-to-be-ignorant-of are composed white subjects. The relation is inherently oppressive. One group is liberated while the others are bound. 

In the US, the social interpellation process is one of becoming white, living with whiteness, bargaining with white power, coping with white supremacy. It’s violent, interpellative social action. It occurs where all social action is organized, within the free market. Thus, it is both passively and actively consumed. It’s both affliction and consolation. Those who are afflicted are passively composed white subjects who endure composition regardless; those who are consoled are actively composed white individuals who answer an invitation to composition without endurance. It’s from this interpellation the supremacist conception of the individual and its western philosophical tradition springs. Capitalism has embraced this conception from its beginnings and has sublimated the concept in its contemporary state. Hence, white individuals are often aggressively recalcitrant participants in anti-racist action; obstinate and uncooperative toward the authority in any discourse that confronts white supremacy, yet passively obeisant to the authority in white power. For example, we’re asked to embrace an equality and social justice discourse that ignores oppressive power relationships in exchange for attention to singular issues that fail to significantly confront white supremacy and its power structure. We must talk about distribution of goods and services; we must address all individuals as consumers and employees. In other words, we are always already encouraged to see others without difference, to see others as if we all are equally born, that we are, in a significant manner, equivalencies.

It’s a rare occurrence to find a white person unconditionally willing to betray the authority in whiteness. And it’s why I’m dutifully mean about it with white tumblr bloggers; as mean as I am about it IRL. I won’t permit the passive violence in white power between social liberals to sit unexamined and have made a promise to return any and all forms of violence with like violence. I’m especially mean to tepid social justice discourse that pushes for the degraded equality I discussed just above. I expect the libertarian white boys to deny all of this outright. I expect more from people who claim enlightenment and progressivism.

I will do this until we reside in societies that have overcome white power. Don’t see that happening any time soon. So, fucking deal is my attitude. I can’t trust white people who aren’t willing to betray their permissive whiteness, their unexamined possessive-whiteness, their unearned ambition.

(via dagseoul)

dagseoul:

Scott Brown staffers and GOP operatives enjoy their racism. GO GOP!

Things White People Like to Do: Tomahawk Chops & War Whoops

1 note

dagNotes: On Freedom; Or, Why I don’t trust most white people.

dagseoul:

They believe they have a freedom that, factually and historically, no person of color has, the freedom (to pretend) to be ignorant of difference. The performance of this ignorance to others—white and not-white—is one of the most pervasive and irritating aspects of everyday whiteness. This freedom is a distinctly white privilege. I’d say, this freedom is the most recognizable marker for whiteness as it’s the most ordinary in appearance. People who can be free from knowing about others who are not white are fully composed white individuals. The others-to-be-ignorant-of are composed white subjects. The relation is inherently oppressive. One group is liberated while the others are bound. 

In the US, the social interpellation process is one of becoming white, living with whiteness, bargaining with white power, coping with white supremacy. It’s violent, interpellative social action. It occurs where all social action is organized, within the free market. Thus, it is both passively and actively consumed. It’s both affliction and consolation. Those who are afflicted are passively composed white subjects who endure composition regardless; those who are consoled are actively composed white individuals who answer an invitation to composition without endurance. It’s from this interpellation the supremacist conception of the individual and its western philosophical tradition springs. Capitalism has embraced this conception from its beginnings and has sublimated the concept in its contemporary state. Hence, white individuals are often aggressively recalcitrant participants in anti-racist action; obstinate and uncooperative toward the authority in any discourse that confronts white supremacy, yet passively obeisant to the authority in white power. For example, we’re asked to embrace an equality and social justice discourse that ignores oppressive power relationships in exchange for attention to singular issues that fail to significantly confront white supremacy and its power structure. We must talk about distribution of goods and services; we must address all individuals as consumers and employees. In other words, we are always already encouraged to see others without difference, to see others as if we all are equally born, that we are, in a significant manner, equivalencies.

It’s a rare occurrence to find a white person unconditionally willing to betray the authority in whiteness. And it’s why I’m dutifully mean about it with white tumblr bloggers; as mean as I am about it IRL. I won’t permit the passive violence in white power between social liberals to sit unexamined and have made a promise to return any and all forms of violence with like violence. I’m especially mean to tepid social justice discourse that pushes for the degraded equality I discussed just above. I expect the libertarian white boys to deny all of this outright. I expect more from people who claim enlightenment and progressivism.

I will do this until we reside in societies that have overcome white power. Don’t see that happening any time soon. So, fucking deal is my attitude. I can’t trust white people who aren’t willing to betray their permissive whiteness, their unexamined possessive-whiteness, their unearned ambition.

dagNotes: On Freedom; Or, Why I don’t trust most white people.

They believe they have a freedom that, factually and historically, no person of color has,  the freedom (to pretend) to be ignorant of difference. The performance of this ignorance to others—white and not-white—is one of the most pervasive and irritating aspects of everyday whiteness. This freedom is a distinctly white privilege. I’d say, this freedom is the most recognizable marker for whiteness as it’s the most ordinary in appearance. People who can be free from knowing about others who are not white are fully composed white individuals. The others-to-be-ignorant-of are composed white subjects. The relation is inherently oppressive. One group is liberated while the others are bound. 

In the US, the social interpellation process is one of becoming white, living with whiteness, bargaining with white power, coping with white supremacy. It’s violent, interpellative social action. It occurs where all social action is organized, within the free market. Thus, it is both passively and actively consumed. It’s both affliction and consolation. Those who are afflicted are passively composed white subjects who endure composition regardless; those who are consoled are actively composed white individuals who answer an invitation to composition without endurance. It’s from this interpellation the supremacist conception of the individual and its western philosophical tradition springs. Capitalism has embraced this conception from its beginnings and has sublimated the concept in its contemporary state. Hence, white individuals are often aggressively recalcitrant participants in anti-racist action; obstinate and uncooperative toward the authority in any discourse that confronts white supremacy, yet passively obeisant to the authority in white power. For example, we’re asked to embrace an equality and social justice discourse that ignores oppressive power relationships in exchange for attention to singular issues that fail to significantly confront white supremacy and its power structure. We must talk about distribution of goods and services; we must address all individuals as consumers and employees. In other words, we are always already encouraged to see others without difference, to see others as if we all are equally born, that we are, in a significant manner, equivalencies.

It’s a rare occurrence to find a white person unconditionally willing to betray the authority in whiteness. And it’s why I’m dutifully mean about it with white tumblr bloggers; as mean as I am about it IRL. I won’t permit the passive violence in white power between social liberals to sit unexamined and have made a promise to return any and all forms of violence with like violence. I’m especially mean to tepid social justice discourse that pushes for the degraded equality I discussed just above. I expect the libertarian white boys to deny all of this outright. I expect more from people who claim enlightenment and progressivism.

I will do this until we reside in societies that have overcome white power. Don’t see that happening any time soon. So, fucking deal is my attitude. I can’t trust white people who aren’t willing to betray their permissive whiteness, their unexamined possessive-whiteness, their unearned ambition.

Scott Brown staffers and GOP operatives enjoy their racism. GO GOP!

Things White People Like to Do: Tomahawk Chops & War Whoops

1 note

White People Problems

dagseoul:

thelittlestonedfox:

More social justice bullshit saying every white person is a racist piece of shit that’s privileged and needs to shut their mouths. Disgusting. Absolutely fucking disgusting. Way to devolve, tumblr. Seriously. Telling any one who’s white to check their privilege. It’s seriously disturbing.

Look, cracker tears. Tickturd.

By the way, I don’t tell “any one who’s white to check their privilege.” I write about whiteness, which is an ideological apparatus. White people, then, respond to my writing and then I address those responses. 

See how that works. It’s whiny ass teeny baby white people and their hurt bottoms that come to me with their ass-pain and expect me to exonerate them from their whiteness because white people are possessive of their whiteness, not their privilege, their ideological composition. Any fool can recognize privilege. And you’re too immature to see that. You just don’t know what I’m talking about. 

But that’s ok. We don’t need you in this discussion.